Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Battle of Cartagena de Indias
Appearance
- Coordinator note, this review was initiated by Tttom (talk · contribs) at 22:50 UTC on 16 August 2010. -MBK004 00:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
AustralianRupert
[edit]in the References, Citation # 41 has a bare url which should be formatted so that the chain is not visiable (you've done this with the others);- in the Bibliography section, the works without ISBNs should have OCLC numbers. These can be found at [1];
- I haven't seen these used in articles on WP. Browsing the last few FAs today, not one show an OCLC number.
in the Bibliography section, the link to "Tobias Smollett" shouldn't be in brackets, it should just be piped as you've done with Fernandez;- Done.
according to the Featured article tools one of your external links is broken: [2];- Done.
- Alt text could be added to the images per WP:ALT;
- not sure what is needed exactly but added some additional text. Tried following the usage in WP:ALT but caption just disappeared. Tttom1 (talk) 04:54, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
the Advisor script reports that the ISBN for "Harbon, John D..Trafalgar and the Spanish navy, Conway Maritime Press, 2004, ISBN 08700216953, pp.108 - 113." in Citation # 49 might not be correct, can you please investigate?AustralianRupert (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)- Done.
XavierGreen
[edit]- I'm not sure how detailed the information that exists on the subject is, but articles on large battles such quite often have an order of battle section.XavierGreen (talk) 06:11, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- As the composition of forces changes over the course of the action, those forces particular to that part are given in the section related.Tttom1 (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Woody
[edit]It is looking good, much better than the previous incarnations of the article.
- The lead is too small for the size of the article. I would suggest a couple of good-sized paragraphs.
"Blas de Lezo, a Basque, was an experienced, wily and tenacious Spanish Naval commander, whose previous career was as daring and spectacular as any naval officer of his day." This is all a bit POV and unsupported by sources. Any source for this, is it a quote- Sources given at end of paragraph: Rodgers and Harbon.
- Which language version are we going for? Manoeuvre would seem correct to me? Same with harbor-->harbour etc
- I use American English spelling, I believe either is correct, but use should be one or the other. In this case, as the primary editor, it should follow American spelling - I suppose.Tttom1 (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
"The expedition was very slow getting started from England. Initially, contrary winds delayed the sailing until most of the shipboard provisions were consumed and a steep increase of sickness[50] occurred among the ship crews, then news of the sailing of the French squadrons and a Spanish squadron caused further delay while the British fleet was reinforced in response." This is too long, can we split it in two?- Done.
- It might benefit from a slight copyedit, quite a few sentences don't seem to run well to me.
- Overall though, this is a good article that deals with the issues neutrally. Good work, Woody (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Any reason why there's a picture of Philip V from 1700 in this article? Herodotus1960 (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good question, the correct King reigns, twice - switching to another image. Done.Tttom1 (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)